Drawing for KOALA BABY NATURAL

USPTO serial 77154891

KOALA BABY NATURAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KOALA BABY NATURAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Todd Braverman

Todd Braverman BRYAN CAVE LLP1290 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10104-0101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Shampoo, hand and face lotions and creams, soaps, baby shampoo, baby oil, baby lotion, baby bubble bath, baby wash, baby powder, non-medicated diaper rash, cradle cap and baby eczema ointment, lotion and cream, tooth and gum cleanser, toothpaste, cotton swabs for cosmetic purposes, cotton balls for cosmetic purposes, non-medicated saline eye spray, baby wipes and pre-moistened cosmetic tissues, sunscreen creams and lotions, laundry detergent, stain remover, fabric softener, non-medicated stretch mark, bust firming and nipple creams, lotions and ointments; leg, foot and body massage creams and lotionsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 6, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 6, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 6, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 5, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Dec 11, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 18, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 9, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2007GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Jun 14, 2007GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Jun 14, 2007CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Jun 7, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 17, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance