USPTO serial 77155393
BABY IQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAKER, JORDAN A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BABY IQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lee B. Beitchman
Lee B. Beitchman Beitchman & Hudson215 14th Street, NWAtlanta, GA 30318-5303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Calendars, children's interactive activity books for children ages five and older, sheet music, photo and scrapbook albums, gift wrapping paper, greeting cards, arts and craft paint kits, markers, crayons, pens, pencils, stickers, rubber stamps, stamp pads, stationery, craft paper, pencil boxes, and printed teaching materials featuring educational materials for use in developing and improving the creative and intellectual faculties of infants and children | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |