Drawing for WEALTH ACCOUNTANTS

USPTO serial 77155454

WEALTH ACCOUNTANTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEALTH ACCOUNTANTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David A.W. Wong

David A.W. Wong BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 S MERIDIAN STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-3506UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035business management and business consultation; accounting servicesACTIVE
036financial management; financial planning; financial analysis and consultation; financial portfolio management; financial research; financial exchange; financial services in the nature of investment security; financial forecasting; loan financing; financing services; lease-purchase financing; financial information provided by electronic means; financial investment in the field of securities; financial valuation of real estate; real estate appraisals; real estate brokerage; financial evaluation for insurance; insurance brokerage; insurance consultation; insurance agencies in the field of home, accident, life and trauma; insurance brokerage in the field of home, accident, life and trauma; financial investment in the field of real estate and securitiesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 30, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 30, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jan 26, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jan 26, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 26, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jun 26, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jun 4, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 4, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 13, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 13, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 13, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 21, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 21, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 21, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 29, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 3, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 3, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 16, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 7, 2007GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 7, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 7, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 17, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance