Drawing for SUPERIOR CARING PRODUCTS

USPTO serial 77156605

SUPERIOR CARING PRODUCTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPERIOR CARING PRODUCTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Clinton J. Cusick

Clinton J. Cusick Muskin & Cusick LLC100 West Main StreetSuite 205Lansdale, PA 19446

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Installation of bathtubs, walk-in bathtubs, toilets, oversized toilets, sinks, shower enclosures, handicapped accessible toilets, handicapped accessible showers, barrier free showers, handicapped accessible bathtubs, hydrotherapy tubs, elevators, stair lifters, bath tub lifters, pool and spa lifts, saunas, steam rooms, barrier-free bathing systemsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 21, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 21, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 19, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 19, 2008AAUDAMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED
Feb 14, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 14, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Feb 14, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 14, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 25, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 25, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 13, 2007AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jun 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 25, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
May 25, 2007EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED
Apr 18, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance