Drawing for UTAH FLASH

USPTO serial 77157469

UTAH FLASH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UTAH FLASH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anil George

ANIL GEORGE NBA PROPERTIES, INC.645 5TH AVE FL 19NEW YORK, NY 10022-5986UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, hosiery, footwear, basketball shoes, basketball sneakers, T-shirts, shirts, polo shirts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, pants, tank tops, jerseys, shorts, pajamas, sport shirts, rugby shirts, sweaters, belts, ties, nightshirts, hats, caps, visors, warm-up suits, warm-up pants, warm-up tops/shooting shirts, jackets, wind resistant jackets, parkas, coats, baby bibs not of paper, head bands, wrist bands, aprons, undergarments, boxer shorts, slacks, ear muffs, gloves, mittens, scarves, woven and knit shirts, jersey dresses, dresses, cheerleading dresses and uniforms, swim wear, bathing suits, swimsuits, bikinis, tankinis, swim trunks, bathing trunks, board shorts, wet suits, beach cover-ups, bathing suit cover-ups, bathing suit wraps, sandals, beach sandals, beach hats, sun visors, swim caps, bathing caps, novelty headwear with attached wigsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 8, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 4, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 9, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 9, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Sep 1, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 30, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 30, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 30, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 30, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 30, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 28, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Aug 23, 2012PBTQWITHDRAWN FROM PUB OTQR REQUEST
Aug 14, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 11, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 8, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Feb 8, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Aug 8, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Aug 2, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 27, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 27, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 27, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 25, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 24, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 23, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 17, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 17, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 17, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 17, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jan 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 15, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 10, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 20, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Apr 19, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance