Drawing for XANTHORICH

USPTO serial 77160760

XANTHORICH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with XANTHORICH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary and nutritional supplementsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 5, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 7, 2013GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 7, 2013GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 7, 2013CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Feb 7, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 7, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 7, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Feb 7, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 7, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 31, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Aug 14, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 14, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 14, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Feb 14, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 14, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 14, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Feb 14, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 14, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 6, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Aug 31, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 31, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 31, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Aug 11, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Feb 9, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 9, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 9, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Feb 8, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 8, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 3, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Aug 30, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 30, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 30, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Aug 27, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 27, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 24, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Jul 20, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 9, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 9, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 9, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Feb 22, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Aug 21, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 21, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 21, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Aug 20, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 20, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 18, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Mar 3, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 3, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 3, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Sep 3, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 3, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 3, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Aug 29, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 28, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Mar 9, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 9, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 9, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Feb 9, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Feb 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 9, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 9, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 9, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Aug 2, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 24, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance