Drawing for GREENKEY

USPTO serial 77161749

GREENKEY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GREENKEY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. Lee Fraley

R. LEE FRALEY SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.ONE ARIZONA CENTER, 400 E. VAN BURENPHOENIX, AZ 85004-2202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers mounted on fireplaces and stovesACTIVE—
011Wood burning, gas and pellet fuel stovesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 5, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 6, 2009CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 6, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 6, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 6, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 6, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 6, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2009CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 24, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 23, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 23, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 23, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2008CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 27, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 27, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 27, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 6, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 4, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 26, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 25, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance