Drawing for THE SMART SET REVIEW FROM DREXEL UNIVERSITY

USPTO serial 77161885

THE SMART SET REVIEW FROM DREXEL UNIVERSITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ALLEN, BENJAMIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE SMART SET REVIEW FROM DREXEL UNIVERSITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberta Jacobs-Meadway

Roberta Jacobs-Meadway, Esq. Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott L.L.C.Two Liberty Place, 50 South 16th Street22nd FloorPhiladelphiaq, PA 19102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041providing an online multimedia magazine featuring articles, interviews, audio clips and video clips on general interest subject matterACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 15, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 18, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 10, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 10, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 10, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 10, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 10, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 3, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 25, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance