USPTO serial 77162698
BLUE BAY RESORTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3756425Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 9, 2010
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BLUE BAY RESORTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MALAGA, ES
DISTRITO Y PROVINCIA DE PANAMA, PA
Madrid, ES
Madrid, ES
Madrid, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arturo Perez-Guerrero
ARTURO PEREZ-GUERRERO LAW OFFICES OF ARTURO PEREZ-GUERREROP.O. BOX 9024163SAN JUAN, PR 00902-4163UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Providing temporary accommodation; Serving food and drinks; Hotels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LOPEZ MONROY, SUSANA
- Other trademarks owned by SFERA 39-E CORP
- Other trademarks owned by HOTETUR CLUB, S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by HOTETUR CLUB, S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by HOTETUR CLUB, S.L.
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named BLUE BAY RESORTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 9, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 11, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 22, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |