Drawing for PV/T

USPTO serial 77163469

PV/T

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PV/T?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Colleen F. Goss

Colleen F. Goss Fay Sharpe LLP1228 Euclid AvenueThe Halle Building, 5th FloorCleveland, OH 44115

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011solar collection systems for producing electricity and heating, air ventilating, and air humidification, comprising insulation, metalsiding, metal roof panels, glazing, integral air channels, air intakes, fans, ducts, burners, controllers, photovoltaic panels, dampers, and heat loss recovery components, namely, metalsiding and metal roofing acting as heat transfer surfaces, and controls for all of the foregoingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 5, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 23, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 1, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 31, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 10, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 4, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 3, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 7, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 18, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 18, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 18, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance