USPTO serial 77163789
QUIKSTIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUIKSTIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Orangeville, ON, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nancy Oliver LeSourd
NANCY OLIVER LESOURD GAMMON & GRANGE, P.C.8280 GREENSBORO DR FL 7MC LEAN, VA 22102-4905UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing for men, women, children, infants and babies, namely, hats, t-shirts, namely, long, short and sleeveless t-shirts, golf shirts, baseball caps, jackets, outerwear, namely, hooded sweatshirts, shorts, pants, track pants, socks, fleece jackets, fleece vests, visors, toques, warm-up suits, swim shorts and suits, leisure pants, sweatshirts, jerseys, sweaters, rainwear, wind resistant jackets, underwear, night shirts, sleepwear, ear muffs, neck warmers, scarves, athletic uniforms, tank tops, gloves, mittens, belts, buckles, ties, vests, turtlenecks, sweat bands, wrist bands, footwear, infant wear, cloth bibs, infant sleepers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |