USPTO serial 77164587
MUSASHI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHIH, SALLY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MUSASHI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JACQUELINE M. STELLING
JACQUELINE M. STELLING NESTLE NUTRITION12 VREELAND ROAD, 2ND FLOORFLORHAM PARK, NJ 07932UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Concentrated food supplements made with carbohydrates, dietetic drinks and foods for medical use; nutritional and dietetic supplements; vitamin preparations; mineral food supplements; meal replacement bars, capsules, drinks and powders; drink mixes used as a meal replacement; nutritional energy bars for use as a meal substitute; protein for use as a food supplement | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Cereal-based snack foods; cereal-based ready-to-eat food bars; grain-based ready-to-eat food bars; rice-based snack foods; wheat-based snack bars; wheat-based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Mineral water; table water; flavored water; energy drinks containing jelly; isotonic beverages and sport drinks; aloe vera drinks and juices, beverages made with cola, fruit and vegetable juice; fruit juice concentrates and fruit nectars; syrups, extracts and essences for making non-alcoholic, non-carbonated soft drinks; soda water | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Societe des Produits Nestle S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Societe des Produits Nestle S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named MUSASHI
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 30, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 21, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 12, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 3, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |