USPTO serial 77164596
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Los Angeles, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill M. Pietrini, Esq.
JILL M. PIETRINI, ESQ. MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP11355 W OLYMPIC BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1631UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, lip pencils, eye shadow, eyeliner, eyebrow pencil, eye pencil, lip gloss, lipstick, non-medicated lip balm, mascara, nail polish, blush, concealer, compacts, artificial eyelashes, artificial fingernails, nail polish top coat, nail polish base coat, lip foundation, and eyebrow gloss; skin care products, namely, astringent for cosmetic purposes, bath gel, bath oil, bath powder, beauty mask, body cream, bubble bath, eye cream, skin moisturizer, essential oils for personal use, eye make-up remover, facial scrubs, make-up remover, hand cream, massage oil, shaving cream, skin clarifiers, skin soap, skin emollients, sun screen preparations, suntanning preparations, depilatory creams, after-shave lotion, and anti-wrinkle cream; hair care products, namely, hair dyes, hair conditioners, non-medicated hair care preparations, hair waving lotion, hair rinses, hair color removers, and hair shampoo; and incense | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 19, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 22, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 23, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |