USPTO serial 77165394
RHX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RHX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pamela S. Chestek
Pamela S. Chestek Red Hat, Inc.1801 Varsity DriveRaleigh, NC 27606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, computer programs for operating systems, computer programs for system administration, computer programs for network administration services delivered over a global computer network, namely, software used to provide software maintenance, updates and enhancements and software used to provide network security maintenance, updates and enhancements and software used for managing network assets; computer software used for performance measurement, benchmarking and capacity planning of computer networks; computer software to facilitate on-line commercial transactions, namely, software to perform verifications of credit card and other types of non-cash transactions over a global computer network; computer software for use in development, modification, debugging, troubleshooting, enhancement of speed stability of computer systems, profiling and simulation of software; computer software and computer hardware for host and embedded microprocessor systems for use in development, modification, debugging, troubleshooting, performance enhancement, profiling and simulation of software; embedded system computer hardware, real-time system computer hardware and computer software for use as an operating system and for use in controlling embedded computing devices, namely, cell phones, Internet access devices, personal data assistants and microprocessors, in real time; embedded application programming interface software; computer software development tools; instructional manuals for all of the foregoing sold as a unit therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Computerized on line ordering service featuring multimedia products and computer software in the form of compact discs, CD ROMs, and direct digital transmission | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for the transmission of messages among computer users and subscribers concerning general open source software reviews and prices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Red Hat, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Red Hat, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RHX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 23, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |