Drawing for SHIPMAN & GOODWIN LLP

USPTO serial 77166122

SHIPMAN & GOODWIN LLP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHIPMAN & GOODWIN LLP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine F. Intravia, Esq.

CATHERINE F. INTRAVIA, ESQ. SHIPMAN & GOODWIN LLPONE CONSTITUTION PLAZAHARTFORD, CT 06103-1919UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, conducting seminars, workshops, classes and conferences in the field of lawACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 8, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 16, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 8, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 8, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 14, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 14, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 7, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 1, 2007MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 30, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance