USPTO serial 77166675
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Technical Development (HK) Limited
183 Queen's Rd Central, HK
Other trademarks owned by Technical Development (HK) Limited
Technical Development (HK) Limited
183 Queen's Rd Central, HK
Other trademarks owned by Technical Development (HK) Limited
Technical Development (HK) Limited
183 Queen's Rd Central, HK
Other trademarks owned by Technical Development (HK) Limited
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Electrical wine cooler, namely, refrigerated cabinets containing racks for wine bottles and storage shelves; electrical kettles; apparatus for steam generating, namely, a steam generator; refrigerating machines, namely, chest freezers, deli cases, freezers; apparatus for barbecues, namely, oven ranges; grill accessories, namely, a metal grilling sheet; electrical coffee machines; electrical cooking utensils, namely, electrical rice cooker, electrical slow cooker, electrical bread making machines for domestic use; electrical deep fryers; electric grills; cooking appliances, namely, microwave ovens | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Corkscrews; bottle opener; wine pourers, namely, wine dispensers in the nature of wine preservation, wine station for bar; wine pourer composed of steel; vacuum pumps for wine bottles, namely, wine vacuum stopper; wine stopper made of cork; bottle opener, namely, champagne opener; wine cooler; wine collar, namely, wine bottle collar; wine funnel; wine shower, namely, decanters; cocktail stirrers; decanters; ice buckets; stand for corkscrews; silicon brush for basting meat; cake server; household grater with wooden board sold as a unit; bamboo chopping board for kitchen use; spaghetti measure, namely, spaghetti measurement tool; carving board, namely, cheese board; cutting boards for the kitchen; manual pepper and salt mill; hand-operated grinders, namely, salt grinder; whisk head; whisks; hand-operated coffee grinders; manually actuated pump dispensers for attachment to containers for use in dispensing liquids, namely, oil dispensers, oil sprayer and vinegar sprayer; scoops; cake servers; salt and pepper shakers; non-electric coffee maker; cooking utensils namely, cooking forks and basting, serving and mixing spoons; electric toothbrushes, and juice maker, namely, non-electric juicers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Advertising services; business management; business administration; providing office functions; retail services, namely, retail store services featuring housewares, kitchen utensils; sales promotion for others; provision of business information, including via the Internet; organizing and conducting trade show exhibitions in the field of cutlery, household or kitchen utensils, including electrical appliances, household or kitchen articles and glassware, porcelain and earthenware; the bringing together, for the benefit of others, of the aforesaid goods, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods from a general merchandise catalogue by mail order or by means of telecommunications, from a general merchandise Internet web site in a department store | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 4, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |