USPTO serial 77167185
PENTHOUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PENTHOUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Casino and gaming services; cabaret services; nightclub services; entertainment services, namely, live performances by singers, comedians, dancers, and musicians; providing non-wagering casino and gaming services by means of web sites and a global information network; production of movies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | PGDV | PETITION GRANTED - REQUEST TO DIVIDE FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 21, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |