USPTO serial 77167341
EXCAVATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3767878Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 30, 2010
- Examiner
- BAKER, JORDAN A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EXCAVATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CAMP HILL, PA, US
Ames True Temper Properties, Inc.
Wilmington, DE, US
Ames True Temper Properties, Inc.
Wilmington, DE, US
Ames True Temper Properties, Inc.
Wilmington, DE, US
CAMP HILL, PA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robyn S. Lederman
Robyn S. Lederman Brooks Kushman P.C.1000 Town Center, 22nd FloorSouthfield, MI 48075-1238UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Manually operated hand tools, namely, spades | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE AMES COMPANIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Ames True Temper Properties, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ames True Temper Properties, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ames True Temper Properties, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AMES TRUE TEMPER, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named EXCAVATOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2026 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 25, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 15, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 27, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2008 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Dec 6, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | PGDV | PETITION GRANTED - REQUEST TO DIVIDE FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2007 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 3, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 3, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |