USPTO serial 77167546
IPOT INTENSE PULSE OPTOTHERMAL THERAPY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANOR, THOMAS M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IPOT INTENSE PULSE OPTOTHERMAL THERAPY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Aliso Viejo, CA
Aliso Viejo, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard B. Cates
Richard B. Cates Law Office of Richard B. Cates2629 Manhattan Avenue, PMB-273Hermosa Beach, CA 90254UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Phototherapeutic apparatus for medical purposes, namely, a LED (light-emitting diode) light source for medical and aesthetic skin treatments; Electrically-powered apparatus for treating skin by applying low level light and sonic vibrations to the skin; Light emitting devices, namely, lamps and LED devices for treatment of a variety of skin conditions; Skin care analyzers and light therapy equipment, namely, a black-light blue lamp unit for use in identification of a variety of skin conditions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 11, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 10, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 1, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2007 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2007 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |