USPTO serial 77167826
SILVER STRIKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SILVER STRIKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald E. Helget
GERALD E. HELGET BRIGGS AND MORGAN, P.A.80 S 8TH ST STE 2200MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-2157UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 013 | explosive compounds and powders, namely, firearm powders and muzzle loading firearm propellants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |