USPTO serial 77167900
THE GREEN SHOPPING CHANNEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3645116Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 23, 2009
- Examiner
- COWARD, JEFFERY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE GREEN SHOPPING CHANNEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW CANAAN, CT
NEW CANAAN, CT
NEW CANAAN, CT
NEW CANAAN, CT
NEW CANAAN, CT
NEW CANAAN, CT
NEW CANAAN, CT
New Canaan, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew C. Wagner
Matthew C. Wagner Diserio Martin O'Connor & Castligioni LLPOne Atlantic StreetStamford, CT 06901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services and retail store services available through the Internet and interactive television, all featuring health and beauty aids, cosmetics, perfumery, hair care and styling preparations, dietary and nutritional supplements, herbal remedies, beverages, [exercise equipment and products,] and cleaning products;[ telemarketing] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 4, 2009 |
| 038 | Television, Internet and radio broadcasting services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 18, 2007 |
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of on-going television, Internet, radio and webcast programs featuring news, health and beauty information and public interest information including environmental awareness and consumer product information | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 29, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WHITCOMB, JON
- Other trademarks owned by WHITCOMB, JON
- Other trademarks owned by WHITCOMB, JON
- Other trademarks owned by WHITCOMB, JON
- Other trademarks owned by TAYLOR, JOHN
- Other trademarks owned by TAYLOR, JOHN
- Other trademarks owned by TAYLOR, JOHN
- Other trademarks owned by PacifiCove LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named THE GREEN SHOPPING CHANNEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 18, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 15, 2009 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 12, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |