Drawing for KING ABDULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 77168240

KING ABDULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KING ABDULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUE10TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business services, namely, management of universities and university facilities; business consulting services with regard to establishing universities, administration of universities, and development of new universities and educational institutions; services including recording, transcription, transformation, composition, compilation and systemization of information used in electronic transmissions; retail bookstore services and retail variety store services for universities; real estate sales management; facility management; association services, namely, promoting the interests of universitiesACTIVE—
042Research and design services in the field of science and technology; industrial analysis and research services; engineering services for building and property condition assessment, building monitoring and environment compliance consulting; computer services, namely, creating on-line community for study, learning and training; integration and design of a computer system for others and software maintenanceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 13, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 12, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 19, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 12, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 3, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jul 2, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 10, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 10, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 20, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA MAILED—
Dec 19, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 11, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 11, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 12, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 17, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 9, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 9, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 8, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 8, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 7, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 5, 2012PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 17, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 16, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 16, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 2, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 27, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 27, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 2, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 27, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 26, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 5, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 23, 2010OTHECASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION—
Jun 29, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 21, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 7, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 30, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 7, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 8, 2009IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Dec 3, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 8, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 26, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 10, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 7, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 7, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 7, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 6, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 21, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 21, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 20, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 20, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 20, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 20, 2008PBERWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Feb 19, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 17, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 28, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 2, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance