USPTO serial 77168326
CERTIFIED 900 LB. GORILLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOOLEY, DAVID E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CERTIFIED 900 LB. GORILLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stanley Frank Bronstein
STANLEY FRANK BRONSTEIN LAW OFFICES OF STANLEY F BRONSTEIN9220 E RAINTREE DR STE 105SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260-7589UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Arranging of exhibitions, seminars and conferences; Arranging of seminars; Arranging of seminars and conferences; Conducting workshops and seminars in personal awareness; Conducting workshops and seminars in self awareness; Conducting workshops and seminars in personal improvement and personal growth; Education services, namely, providing live and on-line seminars and courses in the field of personal improvement and personal growth; Education services, namely, providing seminars and courses in the field of personal improvement and personal growth and distribution of course materials in connection therewith; Education services, namely, providing seminars and courses in the fields of personal improvement and personal growth; Educational services, namely providing seminars and courses in the fields of personal improvement and personal growth; Educational services, namely, conducting seminars and courses in the field of personal improvement and personal growth and distribution of course material in connection therewith; Meeting and seminar arranging; Providing on-line training courses and seminars in the field of personal improvement and personal growth; Workshops and seminars in the field of personal improvement and personal growth | ACTIVE | Apr 27, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |