USPTO serial 77168572
RAINBOWTCP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RAINBOWTCP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for wireless content delivery; Computer software for use in all kinds of network devices to increase the Transmission Control Protocol throughput and improve the efficiency of the data delivery; Computer software for use in all kinds of computers to increase the Transmission Control Protocol throughput and improve the efficiency of the data delivery that may be downloaded from a global computer network; Computer software platforms for use in computer operating systems to increase the Transmission Control Protocol throughput and improve the efficiency on using network bandwidth; Computer programs for use in computers or network devices to increase the Transmission Control Protocol throughput and improve the efficiency on using network bandwidth; Computer networking hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer network design and computer software design for the more efficient utilization of the network bandwidth to achieve higher Transmission Control Protocol traffic throughput | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 23, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |