USPTO serial 77168618
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for wireless content delivery; Computer software for use in all kinds of network devices or wireless handsets to improve the efficiency of network bandwidth usage; Computer software for use in all kinds of computers and wireless handsets to improve the efficiency of network bandwidth usage that may be downloaded from a global computer network; Communications servers; Computer networking hardware; WAN (wide area network) hardware; WAN (wide area network) operating software | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |