USPTO serial 77168648
TRUEFIDELITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRUEFIDELITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Glenn H. Lenzen, Jr.
Glenn H. Lenzen HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 4700Denver, CO 80203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Assistive listening device for the hearing impaired; Electric hearing aids; Electrical hearing aids; Electrically operated hearing aids; Hearing aids; Hearing aids for the deaf; Wireless transmitters and receivers for use with hearing aids | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 25, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 1, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 24, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |