USPTO serial 77169488
AO LIGHTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOTT, JASON E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AO LIGHTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Alexander Floum
D. ALEXANDER FLOUM THE WILLIAMS FIRM1850 MT DIABLO BLVD STE 340WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596-4447UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Emergency warning lights; flashing safety lights; safety equipment, namely, beacon lights; safety equipment, namely, LED warning lights; safety equipment, namely, strobe lights; safety equipment, namely, dash lights; safety equipment, namely, deck lights; safety equipment, namely, exterior lights; safety equipment, namely, grille lights; safety equipment, namely, light bars; safety equipment, namely, visor lights; light switches; light flashers; sirens; sirens for vehicles; loudspeakers; Loudspeakers with built in amplifiers; loudspeaker cabinets; sporting goods; hunting equipment | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2006 |
| 011 | Flashlights; searchlights; lights for automobiles; lights for vehicles; lighting apparatus and installations, namely spotlights, klieg lights and searchlights; electric spotlights; lights for use in motor vehicles, namely, exterior decorative lights, truck lights, searchlights, light emitting diode lamps, electric lamps and lighting fixtures; Electric lighting fixtures; floodlights; high intensity search lights; Incandescent light bulbs; Light bars for vehicles; Light panels for vehicles; emergency warning lights; flashing safety lights; safety equipment, namely, beacon lights; safety equipment, namely, LED warning lights; safety equipment, namely, strobe lights; safety equipment, namely, dash lights; safety equipment, namely, deck lights; safety equipment, namely, exterior lights; safety equipment, namely, grille lights; safety equipment, namely, light bars; safety equipment, namely, visor lights; light switches; light flashers; sporting goods; hunting equipment | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |