Drawing for CLASSIC CHOP

USPTO serial 77169828

CLASSIC CHOP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAVACHE, ROBERT JAMES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLASSIC CHOP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Harrison

MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-4385UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012CUSTOM AND SPECIALTY MOTORCYCLES AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR; MOTORCYCLES AND PARTS, PIECES AND ACCESSORIES FOR MOTORCYCLES, NAMELY, WINDSHIELDS AND REAR LUGGAGE RACKS, BACK RESTS, SHIFT LEVERS, BRAKE LEVERS, AND HANDLE BAR LEVERS, MOTORCYCLE HANDLEBAR GRIPS; MOTORCYCLE HANDLEBAR GRIP CAPS; MOTORCYCLE HANDLEBAR GRIP DECORATIVE RINGS; BRAKE AND CLUTCH CONTROL DRESS-UP KIT FOR A MOTORCYCLE COMPRISING SWITCH HOUSINGS, MASTER CYLINDER COVERS, CLUTCH PERCHES, CLAMPS AND HARDWARE ACCENTS; FRAME KITS FOR MOTORCYCLES COMPRISING CHASSIS, FRAMES AND SWING ARMS, FORKS AND SUSPENSIONS SYSTEMS; DRIVE TRAIN COMPONENTS FOR MOTORCYCLES, NAMELY, MOTORCYCLE DRIVE CHAINS AND DRIVE CHAIN TENSION GUIDES; COVERS FOR MOTORCYCLE PARTS, NAMELY, CALIPER COVERS, ROTOR COVERS, MASTER CYLINDER COVERS, HORN COVERS, TANK COVERS, CLUTCH COVERS, BRAKE COVERS, LEVER COVERS, MOTORCYCLE SEAT COVERS, MOTORCYCLE HANDLEBAR COVERS, AND FITTED AND SEMI-FITTED MOTORCYCLE COVERS; WHEELS AND BRAKES FOR MOTORCYCLESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 21, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 12, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 11, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 10, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 10, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 14, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 10, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2007PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
May 4, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance