Drawing for INDIGO ISLAND

USPTO serial 77170774

INDIGO ISLAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INDIGO ISLAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark A. Carlino

Mark A. Carlino Law Office of Mark A. Carlino, P.C.28150 N. Alma School Pkwy.Suite 103/PMB 617Scottsdale, AZ 85262

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Action figures; Bathtub toys; Battery operated action toys; Bendable toys; Board games; Bubble making wand and solution sets; Card games; Children's multiple activity toys; Christmas tree decorations; Crib toys; Dolls and accessories therefor; Electronic learning toys; Mechanical toys; Pet toys; Puzzles; Stuffed toys; Toy animals and accessories therefor; Toy bakeware and cookware; Toy building blocksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 22, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 7, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 7, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 13, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 13, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 14, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 20, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 17, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 17, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 17, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 22, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 30, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 10, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 22, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 17, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 24, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance