USPTO serial 77170840
IE2
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IE2?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark E. Avsec
MARK E. AVSEC BENESCH, FRIEDLANDER, COPLAN & ARONOFF LLP200 PUBLIC SQUARE2300 BP TOWERCLEVELAND, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter, namely books, magazines, newsletters, periodicals, and journals in the field of research and market studies concerning the efficient generation, transportation, storage and utilization of future sustainable energy resources | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Arranging and conducting educational conferences, congresses, and seminars in the field of energy, namely, the development of innovative, energy-efficient technology platforms combined with far-sighted energy use strategies; organizing exhibitions in the field of energy, namely, the development of innovative, energy-efficient technology platforms combined with far-sighted energy use strategies; providing training courses, namely, workshops and distance learning courses in the field of efficient energy generation, transportation, storage and utilization; electronic publishing services, namely, publication of text and graphic works of others on CD-ROMS and via a global computer network featuring information in the field of energy, namely, the development of innovative, energy-efficient technology platforms combined with far-sighted energy use strategies, including efficient energy generation, transportation, storage and utilization | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |