USPTO serial 77170962
PATHCROSSER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PATHCROSSER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard W. James
Richard W. James Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC301 Grant StreetOne Oxford Centre, Suite 3440Pittsburgh, PA 15219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, T-shirts, sport shirts, polo shirts, rugby shirts, jerseys, tank tops, blouses, sweatshirts, sweaters, cardigans, turtleneck shirts, jackets, coats, vests, shorts, dresses, pants, slacks, sweat pants, jeans, socks, neckties, headwear, hats, caps, knit caps, visors, headbands, wrist bands, belts, scarves, pajamas, bathrobes, underwear, body suits, lingerie, hosiery, stockings, garters, gloves, mittens, ear muffs, suspenders, bikinis, swimwear, skiwear, rainwear; athletic suits, namely, ski suits, snowboarding suits, track suits, wet suits; aprons; babywear, namely, baby bottoms and tops; tights, footwear, shoes, boots, slippers, uniforms, overalls | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, hosting on-line web facilities for others for organizing and conducting online meetings, gatherings, events, and interactive discussions; computer services in the nature of customized web pages featuring user-defined information, personal profiles and information; providing customized on-line web pages featuring user-defined information, which includes search engines and on-line web links to other web sites; computer services, namely, hosting on-line interactive public calendars that allow multiple participants to share event schedules, facility reservations, and transportation requests | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 11, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 17, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 12, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 15, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |