USPTO serial 77171330
SEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Marketing services in the field of computers in the nature of providing marketing services for the benefit of others by compiling advertising campaigns, promotional services, and consulting for customers | ABANDONED | Feb 14, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2014 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Oct 27, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2012 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | RRGM | REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT - DISMISSED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 7, 2010 | TRMS | TEAS REQUEST TO MAKE SPECIAL RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 15, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |