USPTO serial 77171497
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Ontario, CA
Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roy L Anderson
ROY L ANDERSON WAGNER, ANDERSON & BRIGHT, LLP3541 OCEAN VIEW BLVDGLENDALE, CA 91208-1211UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Fragrances for personal use; Hair care creams; Hair care kits comprising non-medicated hair care preparations, namely, shampoo and conditioner; Hair care lotions; Perfume; Perfumes; Skin care products, namely, non-medicated skin serum; Skin creams; Skin lotion; Anti-wrinkle creams; Wrinkle removing skin care preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | Candles | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Frames for spectacles and sunglasses; Sunglasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Bracelets; Charms; Jewelry; Jewelry boxes; Jewelry boxes of precious metal; Jewelry cases of precious metal; Jewelry chains; Jewelry watches | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Handbags; Leather handbags; Leather bags, suitcases and wallets; Leather purses; Pocket wallets; Wallets; Purses | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Dinnerware; Goblets; Mugs; Salt and pepper shakers; Stemware; Tea sets; Tea pots; Tea pots made of precious metals | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Belts; Belts made of leather; Leather belts | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |