Drawing for Serial No. 77171497

USPTO serial 77171497

Serial No. 77171497

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 77171497?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roy L Anderson

ROY L ANDERSON WAGNER, ANDERSON & BRIGHT, LLP3541 OCEAN VIEW BLVDGLENDALE, CA 91208-1211UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Fragrances for personal use; Hair care creams; Hair care kits comprising non-medicated hair care preparations, namely, shampoo and conditioner; Hair care lotions; Perfume; Perfumes; Skin care products, namely, non-medicated skin serum; Skin creams; Skin lotion; Anti-wrinkle creams; Wrinkle removing skin care preparationsACTIVE—
004CandlesACTIVE—
009Frames for spectacles and sunglasses; SunglassesACTIVE—
014Bracelets; Charms; Jewelry; Jewelry boxes; Jewelry boxes of precious metal; Jewelry cases of precious metal; Jewelry chains; Jewelry watchesACTIVE—
018Handbags; Leather handbags; Leather bags, suitcases and wallets; Leather purses; Pocket wallets; Wallets; PursesACTIVE—
021Dinnerware; Goblets; Mugs; Salt and pepper shakers; Stemware; Tea sets; Tea pots; Tea pots made of precious metalsACTIVE—
025Belts; Belts made of leather; Leather beltsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 22, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 18, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 26, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 21, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 21, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 1, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 9, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 9, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 23, 2007CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 21, 2007GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2007GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2007CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Aug 15, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance