USPTO serial 77171725
ANGEL GAME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANGEL GAME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chuo-ku Osaka, JP
Chuo-ku Osaka, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil M. Zipkin
ANTHONY F LO CICERO AMSTER ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP90 PARK AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10016-1301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PLAYING CARD READING DEVICE FOR SCANNING PLAYING CARDS TO PREVENT CHEATING DURING CARD PLAYING; NONE OF THE FOREGOING RELATING TO BASEBALL OR SOFTBALL OR A BASEBALL OR SOFTBALL TEAM | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | TABLE GAMING EQUIPMENT NAMELY, PLAYING CARDS, DICE, BOARD GAMES, PLAYING CARD DEALING MACHINES, GAMING TABLES, POKER CHIPS, PLAYING CARD SHUFFLING MACHINES AND JAPANESE PLAYING CARDS; NONE OF THE FOREGOING RELATING TO BASEBALL OR SOFTBALL OR A BASEBALL OR SOFTBALL TEAM | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 8, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 26, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2012 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |