USPTO serial 77172145
DAILY CARE, ANYWHERE!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEIN, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DAILY CARE, ANYWHERE!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Irvington, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Micheline Kelly Johnson
MICHELINE KELLY JOHNSON BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN, CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, P.633 CHESTNUT STREET1800 REPUBLIC CENTRECHATTANOOGA, TN 37450-1800Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Travel kits comprised of saline spray, antiflatulants, oral pain relief preparations, and preparations for treating coughs and cold symptoms for infants | ACTIVE | Mar 15, 2006 |
| 010 | Travel kits comprised of teething rings, nasal aspirators, and medicine droppers for infants | ACTIVE | Mar 15, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |