USPTO serial 77172410
UTAH FARMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3607821Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 14, 2009
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with UTAH FARMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter M. de Jonge
PETER M. DE JONGE THORPE NORTH & WESTERN, LLPPO BOX 1219SANDY, UT 84091-1219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Milk | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 2, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 14, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2015 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2015 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 18, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |