USPTO serial 77172899
Ü
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, COLLEEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Ü?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Georgetown, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Fay O'Brien
FAY O'BRIEN O'BRIEN TM SERVICES688 TWEEDSMUIR AVENUEOTTAWA; ONTARIO, K1Z5P6CANADAGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 7, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |