USPTO serial 77173765
OPERATION JESUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IN, SUNG HYUN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPERATION JESUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Stephenville, TX
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Dissemination of advertisements and of advertising material | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2008 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2008 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2008 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |