Drawing for SUPERCHARGED BANKING

USPTO serial 77174006

SUPERCHARGED BANKING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, TINA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPERCHARGED BANKING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Randel S. Springer

RANDEL S. SPRINGER WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC1 W 4TH STWINSTON SALEM, NC 27101-3806UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Banking and related financial servicesACTIVEMay 14, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 27, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 27, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 13, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 29, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 29, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 31, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 31, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 31, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 4, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 10, 2007AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 26, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 26, 2007EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
May 11, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance