Drawing for AUTOMATIC HEIGHT ADJUSTER

USPTO serial 77174050

AUTOMATIC HEIGHT ADJUSTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OKEKE, BENJAMIN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUTOMATIC HEIGHT ADJUSTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen W. Feingold

Stephen W. Feingold DAY PITNEY LLP7 TIMES SQNEW YORK, NY 10036-6524UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Sewing and embroidering machines and parts thereofACTIVE—
009Computer firmware, software and hardware for use in connection with sewing and embroidering machines as an integral part thereofACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 29, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 28, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 12, 2009EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 23, 2009GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Apr 23, 2009GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 27, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 24, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2008IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Sep 25, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 25, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 24, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 24, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2008AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 19, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 18, 2008EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 25, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 25, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 20, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 21, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance