USPTO serial 77174092
THE CARBO GROUP ABRASIVE INTELLIGENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOTT, JASON E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE CARBO GROUP ABRASIVE INTELLIGENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard J. Shire, Esq.
HOWARD J. SHIRE, ESQ. KENYON & KENYON LLP1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004-1007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Wholesale and retail services relating to chemicals used in industry, science and photography, as well as in agriculture, horticulture and forestry, in particular but not limited to auxiliary fluids for use with abrasives, spray for belt sanding; abrasives, coated abrasives, in particular but not limited to coated abrasives in the form of sheets, strips (not self-adhesive and self-adhesive, Velcro, perforated), rolls, belts, wide belts, cylinders, cones, discs (normal, self-adhesive, Velcro, perforated), mounted flap wheels, flap wheels, flap wheels and flap discs and consisting of paper, fibre, polyester, cloth, foil; non-woven; abrasive paper; graphite canvas; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; grinding machines; grinding tools; grinding wheels (parts of machines); grinding stones (parts of machines); grinding apparatus and instruments; grinding tools (hand operated); grinding wheels, grinding stones and grinding tools, in particular but not limited to external cylindrical grinding wheels, centerless grinding wheels, transport wheels (control wheels), internal grinding wheels, flat and profiled grinding wheels, tool grinding wheels, gearing grinding wheels, lapping discs, hot pressed snagging grinding wheels, diamond and ceramic bonded grinding wheels, cut-off and snagging wheels, stationary cut-off wheels, fetting wheels, foundry grinding wheels; bonded abrasives; polishing wheels; mounted points; grinding files; scythe stones; grinding disks; dressing tools; whetting stones and rubbing blocks; grinding segments; parts and components of all aforementioned goods; grinding apparatus and instruments; grinding tools; grinding wheels; polishing wheels; mounted points; grinding files; scythe stones; dressing tools (all aforementioned goods electronically driven); parts and components of all aforementioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto, in particular but not limited to the field of grinding and abrasive technology; services of an engineer, in particular but not limited to the field of grinding and abrasive technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |