USPTO serial 77174105
RETAIL 100
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RETAIL 100?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. DuPré
JOHN L. DUPRÉ HAMILTON, BROOK, SMITH & REYNOLDS, P.C.PO BOX 9133CONCORD, MA 01742-9133UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Arranging and conducting business conferences and business exhibitions in the fields of buying and selling of home appliances, consumer electronics and internet technology products; Arranging and conducting business conferences and business exhibitions in the fields of buying and selling of construction products, building products, and construction and building services; Arranging and conducting business conferences and business exhibitions in the fields of buying and selling of pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and over-the-counter health and beauty products; Arranging and conducting business conferences and business exhibitions in the fields of buying and selling of stationery, writing products, and office products; and Arranging and conducting business conferences and business exhibitions in the fields of retail sales and retail purchasing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |