USPTO serial 77174228
PASSION TO GROW YOUR BUSINESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PASSION TO GROW YOUR BUSINESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
81400 Senai, Johor, MY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Harrison
Mark Harrison Venable LLPP.O. Box 34385Washington, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Treatment of materials for the manufacture of home appliances and consumer electronics; custom manufacture of molds for use in industry; plastic parts molding; fishing of plastic parts; custom assembling of products for others; prototype fabrication of new products by molding of plastic parts and components thereof; information, advisory and consultancy services all of the foregoing relating to customer manufacture and treatment of plastics | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological consulting and research services all relating to home appliances and consumer electronics; research and development for new products for others; design for others in the field of tools; information, advisory and consultancy services all of the forgoing relating to scientific research and development of new products for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |