USPTO serial 77174496
Serial No. 77174496
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 16, 2012
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, MARK A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with Serial No. 77174496?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MAJOR WIRE INDUSTRIES LTD./LES INDUSTRIES FIL METALLIQUE MAJOR LTEE
Candiac, CA
Other trademarks owned by MAJOR WIRE INDUSTRIES LTD./LES INDUSTRIES FIL METALLIQUE MAJOR LTEE
MAJOR WIRE INDUSTRIES LTD./LES INDUSTRIES FIL METALLIQUE MAJOR LTEE
Candiac, CA
Other trademarks owned by MAJOR WIRE INDUSTRIES LTD./LES INDUSTRIES FIL METALLIQUE MAJOR LTEE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David B. Cupar
David B. Cupar McDonald Hopkins LLC600 Superior Avenue, EastSuite 2100Cleveland, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Wire meshes of straight wires, pre-crimped wires, undulated wires of metal and crimped wires generally made of metal or metal alloys or plastic or composites or a combination of these materials for use for sieving, filtering and sifting rocks, sand, gravel, minerals, products for composting or composted products, products for recycling or recycled products, top soil, mulch, any other materials | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MAJOR WIRE INDUSTRIES LTD./LES INDUSTRIES FIL METALLIQUE MAJOR LTEE
- Other trademarks owned by MAJOR WIRE INDUSTRIES LTD./LES INDUSTRIES FIL METALLIQUE MAJOR LTEE
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 22, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 22, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 4, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2018 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 8, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2012 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |