Drawing for COVERAGECOMPASS.COM

USPTO serial 77174643

COVERAGECOMPASS.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COVERAGECOMPASS.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

Mark I. Peroff Hiscock & Barclay LLPSeven Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Internet database that organizes information about vaccine disbursements and reimbursements used by health care professionalsACTIVE—
039Internet database that stores information about vaccine disbursements and reimbursements used by health care professionalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 5, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 19, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 19, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 25, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 24, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 20, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 20, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 12, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 10, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 18, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 14, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 27, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 27, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 18, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 18, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 18, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 3, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 11, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 20, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 6, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 4, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 29, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 10, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2007GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2007GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2007CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jul 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance