USPTO serial 77174767
THE ART OF THE GREAT TAMALE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE ART OF THE GREAT TAMALE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KEY WEST, FL
DelegacioBenito-Juarez, MX
KEY WEST, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa W. Rosaya
LISA W. ROSAYA BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP1114 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-7703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Household and kitchen utensils not of precious metal or coated therewith, namely spatulas, strainers, turners, sieves, graters, pot and pan scrapers, rolling pins, whisks, skimmers, basting spoons, ice cream scoops, serving forks, forks for barbequing, mixing spoons, serving spoons, slotted spoons, cooking skewers, rolling pins, ladles, cake servers, pie servers and tongs; household and kitchen containers for household use not of precious metal or coated therewith; combs and sponges; brushes except paint brushes, namely nail brushes, pet brushes, shoe brushes, clothes brushes and hair brushes; brush-making materials; articles for cleaning purposes, namely cleaning and dusting cloths, dispensers for cleaning solutions and sponges; steel wool; unworked and semi-worked glass not for building; glassware, porcelain and earthenware not included in other classes, namely bowls, plates, dishes, canister sets, colanders, cups, canteens, carafes, carving boards, gravy boats, ice buckets, meal trays, serving trays not of precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely coats, gowns, dresses, skirts, jackets, tops, bottoms, suits, shirts, overalls, jumpsuits, pants, sweatpants, shorts, jeans, tank tops, camisoles, sweat shirts, cardigans, pullovers, chemises, exercise and jogging suits, loungewear, belts, suspenders, swimwear, beachwear, robes, sleepwear, underwear, neckwear, scarves, rainwear, ski-wear, sweaters, wristbands, headbands, tennis wear, vests, infant wear, Halloween costumes, masquerade costumes, baby bibs not of paper, belts and money belts, foundation garments, leggings, tights, socks and stockings; footwear; headwear, namely, hats, caps, earmuffs and mufflers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WOODWARD, ROBERT G. SR.
- Other trademarks owned by Promecasa, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by WIMER, ALLAN H.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named THE ART OF THE GREAT TAMALE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 8, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |