Drawing for INFINITY INFO SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 77174778

INFINITY INFO SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, REBECCA A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INFINITY INFO SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

VINCENT M. AMBERLY

VINCENT M. AMBERLY LITMAN LAW OFFICES, LTD.P.O. BOX 15035CRYSTAL CITY STATIONARLINGTON, VA 22215

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising business especially in the field of telematic and telephone networks; Advice in the field of business management and marketing; Advice relating to the organisation and management of business; Business consultation; Business consultation services; Business consulting and information services; Business consulting, management, planning and supervision; Business management; Business management and consultation; Business management consultancy services; Business management consultation; Business marketing consulting services; Business marketing services; Advisory services relating to business management and business operations; Assistance, advisory services and consultancy with regard to business planning, business analysis, business management, and business organization; Customer relationship managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 7, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 20, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2007AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
May 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 11, 2007PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
May 11, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance