CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CALIFORNIA ICE COOL

USPTO serial 77175016

CALIFORNIA ICE COOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAN, DAWN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CALIFORNIA ICE COOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arturo Perez-Guerrero

ARTURO PEREZ-GUERRERO LAW OFFICES OF ARTURO PEREZ-GUERREROP.O.BOX 9024163SAN JUAN, PR 00902-4163UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beer; Mineral water; Sparkling water; Fruit drinks; Fruit juices; Syrups for making fruit drinks and fruit drinks; Preparations for making fruit drinks and fruit drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 6, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 6, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 6, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 29, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 7, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 13, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 10, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 9, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 9, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 28, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 21, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 12, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 11, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 24, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 25, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 12, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 11, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance