USPTO serial 77175264
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George H. Spencer
GEORGE H. SPENCER DENNISON, SCHULTZ & MACDONALD1727 KING ST STE 105ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2700UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Sound and video recorders, transmitters, receivers and playback units; vending machines, data processors, computers; analyzers for non-medical purposes, namely, analyzers for voice verification purposes, computer software for authentication technologies; voice authentication for establishing the identity of persons | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring computer software and hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Insurance brokerage and administration; providing financial management services; providing electronic cash transaction and electronic fund transfer services; providing real estate property management, brokerage and appraisal services; providing on-line home banking services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, voice, data, graphics, video and document transmission and reception services via telecommunication means and providing access to telecommunication networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Designing and developing computer hardware and software; installing computer programs; rental and leasing services for computer hardware and software; designing and developing computer hardware and software for use invoice authenticators for establishing the identify of persons; installation of computer software containing data into computer banks; inspection of real estate property | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |