USPTO serial 77175592
WHOLE IN ONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WHOLE IN ONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK HARRISON
MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLP575 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1607UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, tourist guides, maps, books, magazines, brochures, and catalogues relating to travel, holidays and leisure activities | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Operation of resorts and recreational facilities and services relating thereto, namely, country club, tennis club and courts, golf club and courses, beach club, swim clubs and swimming pools, health spa club, yacht club, fitness facilities, horseback riding facilities, marina, interpretive centers, conference facilities, theatre facilities, florist, beauty salon, hair salon, medical clinic, retail stores; advertising services, namely, sales promotion services of condominiums | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Residential dwellings, namely, condominium buildings and units; residential, recreational and resort property development; real estate services, namely, leasing, selling, operating and managing condominiums | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Recreational and sporting activities, namely, golf, tennis, snorkeling, scuba diving, table games, kayak, bicycling, swimming, diving, sightseeing, weight lifting, aerobics, volleyball, horseback riding, yoga, water skiing, boating, yachting, sailing, fishing; educational services offered in a resort environment, namely, conducting courses of instruction in the fields of golf, tennis, snorkeling, scuba diving, table games, kayak, bicycling, swimming, diving, sightseeing, weight lifting, aerobics, volleyball, horseback riding, yoga, water skiing, boating, yachting, sailing, fishing, arts and crafts, computer software applications, language training, gardening, cosmetics, photography, painting, local history, anthropology, public affairs and politics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WHOLE IN ONE NUEVO VALLARTA, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by GOLF ROAD IMMOVABLES LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named WHOLE IN ONE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |